2010-08-17

Adaptron Test Run – 1 - Date: 17th Aug 2010

Now that I have LTM NxtLnks plus their action sequences representing the possible conscious sequences of independent stimuli I am faced with a question about the permanent stimuli. Obviously they had to be independent before becoming permanent. While independent they were followed by all manner of other independent stimuli from any of the possible senses or independent sensors. In this test case I now have B^A being followed by A^B both of which are permanent. Do I start treating them as level 1 sequential stimuli at this point and combine the two into the sequence (B^A)^(A^B) or do I wait for the A^A sequence to form so I can combine them based on overlapping parts. But of course the A^A is never going to occur. And if I do produce the level 2 sequence (B^A)^(A^B) is this then independent?

A different problem is happening in test case #6. Here the A^B and B^A are still independent. But the goal's interest is not being reduced to neutral when it is reached.